When Libs ask a question its a rant, when Reps ask a question its a question..thoughts?

Yes, I have noticed that. You would think the libs just LOST the election (?)When Libs ask a question its a rant, when Reps ask a question its a question..thoughts?
Ry-Guy is right. Why criticize something and do it yourself.





I find that all questions are rants, but the Republican questions, like this, are really unsubstantiated meaningless hyperbole. I mean, what a bizarre, unprovable and unarguable way to smear. And who cares?





On the other hand, I do have to hand it to the Republicans who are actually trying to argue against the stimulus package. There, they have to lie, but at least their lying for a reason, instead of repeating these meaningless hypothetical questions that are simply useless to ponder or object to.When Libs ask a question its a rant, when Reps ask a question its a question..thoughts?
well, why the lib label for dems and the rep label for reps (in your question)? Shouldn't it be dems instead of libs? Or shouldn't you say libs and cons to be fair? And wouldn't it be fair to say SOME dems and SOME reps feel this way? And why no reference to us independents? Whether you are a lib or a dem or a rep or a con, the fact is, independent voters choose our president--about a third of all voters will vote rep no matter what, and a third will vote dem no matter what, and it's that middle third (us independents) who will tilt toward one candidate or the other, so, like it or not, it is the independent/moderate/progressive voter who decides who is president--and in my mind, they made the correct choice last november 4th.
do research %26amp; look at the questions it is easy to see you have it backwards. Right now 2 questions are being asked : (1) what do you feel about Obama's ';porkulous package';. (2) another asked what people think Michele things about Hussein Obama's pork...meanwhile the President has been on CNN every day he has started a website to show where the money is going at recovery.com. He was just on saying how he is not here to help CEO's but the average hard working American. I have always been open to listen to people but republicans keep it up with questions like this %26amp; they are going to start being ignored by me. If you keep it up all you will have is each other. Dems are caring people but to enable republcans to ruin our country is not wise or a good caring thing to do so eventually, very soon we are going to stop the enabling.
That seems to be the pattern here. I havent read a question from a Lib that stimulates me intellectually so far. They're either bashing or name calling.
When Republicans ask questions, it's irrelevant.





We won. They lost. Get over it.
We have nothing to rant about. It is the republicans and their foolish questions .
Because we are insightful and totally intelligent . We are not pseudo-intellectuals who talk down to people !!
It actually goes both ways, I have seen (whom I think are Dem's or Reps) say the same thing to questions.
More of an insane rant, but basically yeah a rant.
It's the difference between misery and happiness.
us republicans think you liberals ought to get a job, but thanks to us you probably cant find one
Both sides rant... your bias is showing and clouding your perspective.
I agree for the most part, but I feel like there are problems with both parties.





The republicans need to get back to their small government roots. Another problem with the republicans is they shoot theirselves in the foot by allowing theirselves to be controlled by the religious right. They call theirselves the ';religious right';, but do you think they would allow a Sikh who is opposed to abortion, to join their group? I doubt they would accept any other faiths even though it would greatly help them fight against issues such as abortion.


If Christian republicans want to start a Christians only group and call it the religious right, then they should be allowed to do that, but that doesn't mean they should try to influence the whole republican party to stay away from encouraging various religious and ethnic communities from joining the republican party. Of course not all republicans are influenced by the religious right, and not all members of the religious right have a problem with Sikhs, Muslims, Hindus, etc, being republicans, but it seems to me this is often the case.
Looks more like the other way around to me.
Is this a rant or a question?
Well this seems like a rant to me...
Both sides are guilty of that. It's not limited to party.
I think that's a load of bull sh*t.
I agree.
No
Are you sure about that?